Remote assessment of augmented reality (AR) applications using in-situ environments is gaining traction. These evaluations involve users interacting with AR experiences within their own residences or other personally relevant spaces, as opposed to controlled laboratory settings. An instance of this includes evaluating the usability of an AR application designed for furniture placement within a user’s living room.
This approach offers several advantages over traditional lab-based studies. It enhances ecological validity, as the user experience is tested in a naturalistic environment that mirrors real-world usage. Furthermore, such evaluations can yield more nuanced data regarding user interaction and acceptance, contributing valuable insights for iterative design improvements and a more robust understanding of how these technologies integrate into daily life. Historically, AR evaluation was primarily confined to laboratories, but advancements in remote testing methodologies have facilitated the increasing adoption of in-situ assessments.
